IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v9y2015i8p344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Evaluation of Fattening, Slaughter and Meat Qualities of Purebred and Hybrid Swine

Author

Listed:
  • Zhanna Aleksandrovna Perevoyko

Abstract

The creation of more productive breeds, lines, types, and their rational use in purebred breeding and hybridization contributes to the efficiency of swine industry. Comparative study on meat quality of pigs is essential for an objective assessment of the bred species, lines, and hybrids. We carried out a study on the meat quality of purebred and hybrid pigs fattening up to 100 kg and 125 kg of live weight under the conditions of an industrial complex. It was established, that of higher nutritional value, as well as of good fattening qualities, was the meat of two-breed hybrids LW × DL and three-breed combinations (LW × DL) × DIb both fattening to100 kg and fattening to125 kg of live weight.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhanna Aleksandrovna Perevoyko, 2015. "Comparative Evaluation of Fattening, Slaughter and Meat Qualities of Purebred and Hybrid Swine," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 344-344, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:8:p:344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/51825/27820
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/51825
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:8:p:344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.