IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v9y2015i8p311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Rice Farming with System of Seeding Direct and Seeding Indirect: A Case Study in Buol Regency Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Max Nur Alam

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze production and income of rice farming with system of seeding direct and seeding indirect with a variety of input usage. This research was conducted with descriptive and comparative methods that described and compared rice farming with system of seeding direct and seeding indirect. The number of samples that were taken amounted 74 household heads. Samples on seeding direct system were taken by census, amounted 34 household heads. Seeding indirect system was determined by 40 household heads (20% of 197 farmers of seeding indirect system), sampling was done by simple random. The result of research showed that rice farming with seeding direct system could save labors when compared with seeding indirect system. The income average of rice farming with seeding direct system were bigger than seeding indirect system. Rice farming with seeding direct system had a prospect to be developed on irrigated rice land with labors that were rare and expensive. However, the application of this system needed to be balanced with the usage of fertilizers, herbicides and reapers, so that labors efficiency could occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Nur Alam, 2015. "Analysis of Rice Farming with System of Seeding Direct and Seeding Indirect: A Case Study in Buol Regency Indonesia," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 311-311, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:8:p:311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/51819/27817
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/51819
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:8:p:311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.