IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v9y2015i7p54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Chitosan Degradation through Hydrothermal and Sonication-Hydrothermal Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Savitri
  • Sumarno Sumarno
  • Achmad Roesyadi

Abstract

Chitosan is a natural substance that has many applications in the fields of pharmacy and medicine. Because it hashigh molecular weight and does not dissolved easily in a neutral pH solution, then there is an effort todepolymerize chitosan into low molecular weight chitosan and oligomers. Nowdays, one of the methods used todegrade biomass is hydrothermal. Hydrotermal is one method of biomass degradation and polymers that is quiteeffective and environmentally friendly. Because chitosan has strong hydrogen bonds in addition to highmolecular weight, it is necessary to treat chitosan by sonication before subjected to hydrothermal process. Thisstudy will compare degrading chitosan by only hydrothermal process and also sonication–hydrothermalprocesses. The hydrothermal of chitosan was carried out using a stainless steel tube reactor of 4-mL capacity at200 °C for 4 s under pressures of 25 MPa for both of hydrothermal systems. For sonication– hydrothermalprocesses, chitosan was treated with sonication at 40 oC for 30 and 120 min before subjected to hydrothermalprocess. After hydrothermal, chitosan was characterized by viscosimetry and HPLC to determine molecularwight and also the dissolved product. Based on the product yield of the process, the sonication (40 °C,120 mins,1 %)-hydrothermal process (200 °C, 4 mins) was the best process on this study and gave lactose yield as much as90 %.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Savitri & Sumarno Sumarno & Achmad Roesyadi, 2015. "Comparison of the Chitosan Degradation through Hydrothermal and Sonication-Hydrothermal Processes," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(7), pages 1-54, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:7:p:54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/50803/27257
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/50803
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:7:p:54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.