IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v8y2014i2p87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Different Systems of the Stability of Cable-Stayed Bridge

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Fangping

Abstract

This paper investigates the stability of cable-stayed bridge under three different structural systems. Fengjie Yangtze River Highway Bridge, A large-span prestressed concrete cable-stayed bridge in Chongqing is analyzed by using nonlinear finite element program ANSYS. The buckling mode and linear and nonlinear stability factors of the bridge are gained and compared by numerical simulation of three structural systems- floating, semi-floating and consolidation bridge structural systems, and their buckling mode and stability factors under two unfavorable live loads are compared. The results show- 1) only in-plane instability is induced regardless of the structure system; 2) the floating system is the most instable among the three; 3) Floating system with longitudinal elastic restraint on the main beam is an ideal structural system. This research provides an important theoretical basis for bridge design and construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Fangping, 2014. "Comparison of Different Systems of the Stability of Cable-Stayed Bridge," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 1-87, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:8:y:2014:i:2:p:87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/35059/19924
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/35059
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:8:y:2014:i:2:p:87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.