IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v3y2009i1p95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Proposed Technique for Analyzing Experiments Of Type

Author

Listed:
  • Abbas Alkarkhi
  • H. C. Low

Abstract

This paper deals with the experiments of type . Fitting a response surface model to this type of experiments was studied using a new technique. This technique depends on partitioning the whole experiment into two experiments and analyzes each experiment separately. In addition to the proposed technique, the least squares method was studied and a comparison is made between the proposed technique and the least squares method. The results showed that the proposed technique and least squares method gave the same results. This indicates that partitioning the whole experiment does not affect the results of fitting the response surface model. This paper proposes an easy technique for analyzing this type of experiments. The results showed that the new technique is easier to use than the least squares method. Simple calculations and substitutions in fixed formulae are used to get the results directly. On the contrary, the least squares method requires complicated calculations to get the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbas Alkarkhi & H. C. Low, 2009. "A Proposed Technique for Analyzing Experiments Of Type," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(1), pages 1-95, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:3:y:2009:i:1:p:95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/831/793
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/831
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:3:y:2009:i:1:p:95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.