IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v3y2009i1p108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Comparison of Capacitance-Based Tomography Data Normalization Methods for Multilayer Perceptron Recognition of Gas-Oil Flow Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Hafizah Talib
  • Junita Mohamad-Saleh
  • Khursiah Zainal-Mokhtar
  • Najwan Osman-Ali

Abstract

Normalization is important for Electrical Capacitance Tomography (ECT) data due to the very small capacitance values obtained either from the physical or simulated ECT system. Thus far, there are two commonly used normalization methods for ECT, but their suitability has not been investigated. This paper presents the work on comparing the performances of two Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural networks; one trained based on ECT data normalized using the conventional equation and the other normalized using the improved equation, to recognize gas-oil flow patterns. The correct pattern recognition percentages for both MLPs were calculated and compared. The results showed that the MLP trained with the conventional ECT normalization equation out-performed the ones trained with the improved normalization data for the task of gas-oil pattern recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Hafizah Talib & Junita Mohamad-Saleh & Khursiah Zainal-Mokhtar & Najwan Osman-Ali, 2009. "On the Comparison of Capacitance-Based Tomography Data Normalization Methods for Multilayer Perceptron Recognition of Gas-Oil Flow Patterns," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(1), pages 108-108, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:3:y:2009:i:1:p:108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/836/814
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/836
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:3:y:2009:i:1:p:108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.