IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v2y2008i4p113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of pH System in Common Effluent Treatment Plant

Author

Listed:
  • B. Meenakshipriya
  • K. Saravanan
  • R. Shanmugam
  • S. Sathiyavathi

Abstract

This investigation considers the study of pH system in Common effluent treatment plant (CETP). For this purpose, Perundurai Common Effluent Treatment (PCETP) is taken for study. Waste from textile industries is rarely neutral. Certain processes such as reactive dyeing require large quantities of alkali but pre-treatments and some washes can be acidic. It is therefore necessary to adjust the pH in the treatment process to make the wastewater neutral. This is particularly important if biological treatment is being used, as the microbes used in biological treatment require a pH in the range of 6-8 and will be killed by highly acidic or alkali wastewater. In PCETP, the wastewater is mostly alkali wastes (high pH). For this purpose, hydrochloric acid (HCl) is added to maintain the pH value from 7.5 to 7.8 to save the microbes used in biological treatment as well as to reduce the wastage of chemicals.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Meenakshipriya & K. Saravanan & R. Shanmugam & S. Sathiyavathi, 2008. "Study of pH System in Common Effluent Treatment Plant," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(4), pages 113-113, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/2447/2297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/2447
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. Meenakhsipriya & K. Saravanan & S. Sathiyavathi, 2009. "Neural Based pH System in Effluent Treatment Process," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(4), pages 166-166, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.