IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v12y2018i10p23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Parallel Performance of Sorting Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Saher Manaseer
  • Ahmad K. Al Hwaitat

Abstract

The performance evaluation of sorting algorithm play a major role in understanding the behavior which has great benefit in most of the field of sciences, knowing the difference between parallel and sequential performance will help the researchers to choose the best algorithm bucket and bubble sort to use and implement. In this research we study the performance of two sorting algorithm and evaluate the difference in performance in aspect of speed up and efficiency, the two algorithms has been tested on IMAN1 super computer with different evaluate input size and different number of processors. The results showed that he performance of runtime for the bubble and bucket sorting algorithms has been effectively reduced by the parallel computing over the large data size and the number of processor of 64 get the lowest running time, and the parallel performance was better than other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Saher Manaseer & Ahmad K. Al Hwaitat, 2018. "Measuring Parallel Performance of Sorting Algorithms," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:12:y:2018:i:10:p:23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/0/0/36853/36908
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/0/36853
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fan Deng & Zhenhua Yu & Xinrui Zhan & Chongyu Wang & Xiaolin Zhang & Yangyang Zhang & Zilu Qin, 2022. "Poliseek: A Fast XACML Policy Evaluation Engine Using Dimensionality Reduction and Characterized Search," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-25, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:12:y:2018:i:10:p:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.