IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v11y2017i5p73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Teaching of Project Management Software Tools Using Scaffolding Based on Cladistics Parsimony Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Stanislaw MAJ

Abstract

Project management software tools are essential tools for the different phases of projects. However a number of software tools exist ranging from the relatively simple to those that extremely feature rich. Feature rich software tools have their advantages due to their wide repertoire of options but can be difficult to learn. Ideally the main steps in project management need to be identified and mapped. The five layer domain analysis model was used (but only the first two layers) in conjunction with cladistics and parsimony analysis to produce a diagrammatic, modular abstraction based on hierarchical top down decomposition. This model contextualizes the steps in project management by means of a high level overview that can be decomposed into greater detail. Significantly it is universally applicable to software management tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanislaw MAJ, 2017. "Improving the Teaching of Project Management Software Tools Using Scaffolding Based on Cladistics Parsimony Analysis," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 1-73, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:11:y:2017:i:5:p:73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/66383/36630
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/66383
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:11:y:2017:i:5:p:73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.