IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v11y2016i3p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of MLP and RBF Neural Networks to Estimate the Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity

Author

Listed:
  • Elmira Sadat Shams Emamzadeh
  • Jaber Soltani
  • Mahmuod Mashal
  • Moosa Kalanaki
  • Tohid Asadolahzadeh

Abstract

Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity is considered one of the physical soil properties that is very important in modeling of water movement and environmental studies. This study aimed to compare the performance of Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF) in neural networks for estimation of the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity. For this, the data of 27 drilled cased borehole permeameter with three kinds of geometry water flow through the soils and the soil texture properties were used as the input parameters for models. The effectiveness of neural networks to estimate the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity were calculated and compared based on mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE) and coefficient determination (R2). According to the above indicators, for all three types of drilled cased borehole permeameter surveyed in this study, the results show MLP neural networks had better performance than RBF neural networks in estimation of the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and for wells with the horizontal, vertical and horizontal-vertical flow, which the amount of coefficient determination were respectively for all of them 0.94, 0.97 and 0.85.

Suggested Citation

  • Elmira Sadat Shams Emamzadeh & Jaber Soltani & Mahmuod Mashal & Moosa Kalanaki & Tohid Asadolahzadeh, 2017. "Performance Evaluation of MLP and RBF Neural Networks to Estimate the Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-1, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:11:y:2016:i:3:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/64307/34604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/64307
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:11:y:2016:i:3:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.