IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v11y2016i1p204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Develop a Comprehensive System for Prioritizing Employment Risk with the Use of Multi-Criteria Decision making approach (Technique Analytical Hierarchy Process)

Author

Listed:
  • Homa Pouresfandyani
  • Sara Najiazarpour

Abstract

This study has tried to detailed quantitative risk assessment methods and techniques Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) experts extracting, classifying and structuring them in addition to showing how to use techniques such as multi-criteria decision making technique AHP development a comprehensive system for prioritizing risk job of great importance. The output of this research as a decision support system in addition to the ease with which managers make decisions about the accuracy of decisions, it is recommended they are assured of multiple criteria decision making use of techniques to managers in the risk management process macro projects and organizations, to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of corrective actions, control and prevention strategies to reduce and control risks in the workplace and promising career cut irreparable effects for the organization and what they do for the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Homa Pouresfandyani & Sara Najiazarpour, 2017. "Develop a Comprehensive System for Prioritizing Employment Risk with the Use of Multi-Criteria Decision making approach (Technique Analytical Hierarchy Process)," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 204-204, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/64439/34648
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/64439
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.