IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jpl123/v19y2026i1p1.html

From Gatekeepers to Gravediggers: The Role of Political Party Leaders and Candidates in Democratic Decline – and the Case for Principled Leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Galinanes
  • Leo Klinkers

Abstract

Political parties remain indispensable to representative democracy, yet their evolving role has become a central driver of democratic decline. Once the guardians of accountability, many parties now function as instruments of personalization, elite entrenchment, and institutional decay. This article examines how the internal dynamics of party leadership—manifested through clientelism, opportunistic candidate selection, and the erosion of programmatic commitments—accelerate the normalization of illiberal practices. Drawing on comparative evidence and democratic theory, it argues that reversing this trend requires a culture of principled leadership grounded in ethical recruitment and transparent accountability. To that end, the article introduces two complementary frameworks- the Political Party Leadership Code (PPLC), which articulates ten normative principles for ethical leadership selection, and the Leadership Scoring Metric (LSM), which operationalizes these standards into measurable criteria. Together, these instruments offer a pathway for institutional and cultural reform, enabling parties to reclaim their gatekeeping function and restore public trust in democratic governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Galinanes & Leo Klinkers, 2026. "From Gatekeepers to Gravediggers: The Role of Political Party Leaders and Candidates in Democratic Decline – and the Case for Principled Leadership," Journal of Politics and Law, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(1), pages 1-1, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jpl123:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/download/0/0/52465/57139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/view/0/52465
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jpl123:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.