IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmsjnl/v14y2024i1p32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3-S BOM: Pioneering Sustainability-Scoring-System for Multi-Functional Product Configurations Based on ESG and Circularity

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Calabrese
  • Francesco Mercuri
  • Gerardo Bosco
  • Jonathan Leidich
  • Sophia Giunta

Abstract

The Bill of Materials (BOM) is the primary place where product configurations are formulated and designed. Despite its critical role, the BOM falls short in addressing sustainability concerns. The current state of the art does not capture data on the sustainability performance of suppliers of listed components. Furthermore, the BOM neglects synthetic information on reusability and circularity of components. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes the introduction of a Sustainability-Scoring-System (3-S BOM). The aim is to upscale the traditional BOM to the new sustainability market demand. The 3-S BOM has two purposes- to integrate synthetic data on sustainability and to allow further configurations of products based on diversified sustainability profiles. Specifically, each component, sub-assembly and assembly within the BOM is assigned an Overall Sustainability Score (OSS), which covers three key sustainability areas On the supplier side, an ESG score will be representative of the supplier’s level of sustainability, while on the component side, a Hazardous Substances and Virgin Materials (HV) indicator and a Hazardous Substances and Virgin Materials Circularity (HVci) indicator will assess the sustainability of the components, taking into account their composition and circularity. The customer is actively involved in defining the sustainability profile of the purchased product by defining how the ESG, HV and HVci must influence the final assembly of the purchased product, choosing between different levels of specificity.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Calabrese & Francesco Mercuri & Gerardo Bosco & Jonathan Leidich & Sophia Giunta, 2024. "3-S BOM: Pioneering Sustainability-Scoring-System for Multi-Functional Product Configurations Based on ESG and Circularity," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-32, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/download/0/0/49723/53739
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/0/49723
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Sampong & Na Song & Kingsley Osei Boahene & Kwame Ansong Wadie, 2018. "Disclosure of CSR Performance and Firm Value: New Evidence from South Africa on the Basis of the GRI Guidelines for Sustainability Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felice Petruzzella & Anastasia Giakoumelou & Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Fostering firm value: Unpacking the effect of circular economy disclosure via social media," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7960-7971, December.
    2. Yuqiu Lu & Guowei Li & Zhe Luo & Muhammad Anwar & Yunju Zhang, 2021. "Does Intellectual Capital Spur Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Growth?: A Study of Chinese and Pakistani Firms," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    3. Zixin Zhang & Teck Lee Yap & Jiyoung Park, 2021. "Does voluntary CSR disclosure and CSR performance influence earnings management? Empirical evidence from China," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 161-178, June.
    4. Feifei Zhang & Jin-young Jung, 2020. "Changes in the Influence of Social Responsibility Activities on Corporate Value over 10 Years in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Shailesh Rastogi & Rebecca Abraham, 2022. "The Influence of Transparency and Disclosure on the Valuation of Banks in India: The Moderating Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance Variables, Shareholder Activism, and Market Power," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Liang Li & Yanghong Wang & Huaping Sun & Huihui Shen & Yuen Lin, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Financial Performance: Is Green Technology Innovation a Missing Link?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Takuya Kiriu & Masatoshi Nozaki, 2020. "A Text Mining Model to Evaluate Firms’ ESG Activities: An Application for Japanese Firms," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 27(4), pages 621-632, December.
    8. Abd Alwahed Dagestani & Lingli Qing & Mohamad Abou Houran, 2022. "What Remains Unsolved in Sub-African Environmental Exposure Information Disclosure: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Andrej Miklosik & Peter Starchon & Milos Hitka, 2021. "Environmental sustainability disclosures in annual reports of ASX Industrials List companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16227-16245, November.
    10. Evans Opoku-Mensah & Yuming Yin & Asantewaa Ampofo Sandra & Priscilla Tuffour, 2019. "Mergers and Acquisitions Antecedents in BRICS," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 11(3), pages 202-214, September.
    11. Mumtaheena Anwar & Sohanur Rahman & Md. Nurul Kabir, 2021. "Does national carbon pricing policy affect voluntary environmental disclosures? A global evidence," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 211-244, April.
    12. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Juan José Maldonado-Briegas, 2019. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Culture Programs Promoting Social Responsibility: A European Regional Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Matteo Pozzoli & Marcello Raffaele, 2022. "Non-financial information and company market value," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2 Suppl.), pages 167-187.
    14. Nithiphak Katisart & Siriluck Sutthachai & Krittapha Saenchaiyathon, 2025. "Can stakeholders evaluate corporate ESG performance through its ESG disclosure? A study of Thai listed firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 461-475, June.
    15. Evans Opoku-Mensah & Yuming Yin & Bismark Addai, 2021. "Do Mature Firms Gain Higher Economic Value from R&D Investment?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 211-223, June.
    16. Elbardan, Hany & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "CSR reporting, assurance, and firm value and risk: The moderating effects of CSR committees and executive compensation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    17. Monday Nweke Igwe & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Ayman Hassan Bazhair, 2023. "Sustainability reporting in Africa: A systematic review and agenda for future research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2081-2100, September.
    18. Hamzeh Al Amosh & Saleh F. A. Khatib, 2024. "Environmental, Social and Governance Performance Disclosure and Market Value: Evidence from Jordan," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(4), pages 539-554, October.
    19. Hamzeh Al Amosh & Saleh F. A. Khatib, 2021. "Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: the case of Jordan," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Akhtar Ali & Imran Abbas Jadoon, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Performance (CSP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-31, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.