IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmrjnl/v17y2025i5p27.html

Running Without Progress: How Game Theory Explains China’s GAOKAO Treadmill

Author

Listed:
  • Chenxi Zhao

Abstract

The intense competition in Chinese education has led to several problems in both family and society. To understand the process of how the intense competition appears, past researchers are showcasing the long history of Chinese Keju or using qualitative analysis to present the diverse influence of high involution. Here, I apply the quantitative analysis- Game Theory Model to give a novel lens to explain the situation. Particularly, I use signaling games for a macro perspective and prisoners' dilemma as the micro angle. To conclude, I find ways to break the intense competition by the analysis using Game theory. Overall, I suggest that the government should raise cost for extra studying to weaken the short-run incentive to betray; increase the discounted factor and reduce short term benefit differential to emphasize trust in cooperation; introduce holistic evaluation to deflate the signal so no students gains from overly investment and input.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenxi Zhao, 2025. "Running Without Progress: How Game Theory Explains China’s GAOKAO Treadmill," Journal of Mathematics Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(5), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmrjnl:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jmr/article/download/0/0/52646/57416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jmr/article/view/0/52646
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmrjnl:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.