IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmbrjl/v8y2018i1p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Duration of Starting Tremor after Drug discontinuation in Parkinson's Patients under Deep Brain stimulation

Author

Listed:
  • Faranak Behnaz
  • Mahshid Ghasemi
  • Yalda Shabanpour

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on the duration of starting tremor after drug discontinuation in patients with Parkinson's disease under deep brain stimulation. In order to reach the research goals, 28 individuals with Parkinson's disease under deep brain stimulation were randomly assigned into two groups including Dexmedetomidine and Propofol that referring to Shahdai Tajrish Hospital in 2016. In the implementation phase. The following drugs were used- Dexmedetomidine (Precedex) with dose of 0.2-0.4 μ/kg/h and Propofol with doses of 20-30 mg bolus, and then 10-20 μ/kg/min infusion, with a control and preservation of BIS between 65 and 85, and also, RAMSY Sedation Score equal to 3. Locus of pin and the head scalp were anaesthetized with lidocaine drug. The total dose of local anaesthetic drugs was recorded at the end of the procedure. The interval time between drug discontinuation and start of tremor, and also, the time of emergence, was recorded as the time between relaxation and when the patient is able to cooperate for a neurological examination. All of the events during the operation and complications and complains of pain and restlessness were recorded. Moreover, the following cases were investigated Post-operative pain, vital signs, and hemodynamic changes, respiratory and alert status of patients for 2 hours in PACU. Patients' pain was measured using VAS (0- painless, 10- maximum pain) at intervals of 30 minutes. Independent t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used for data analysis. Findings showed that there was a significant difference between time to tremor and time to cooperation variables in the two groups. Mean comparison showed that the mean time to tremor and time to cooperation in the Propofol group was higher than the Dexmedetomidine (DEX) group. Other findings showed that there was no significant difference between BIS in the two groups. The results also showed that there was a significant difference between VAS and surgeon satisfaction variables in the two groups. Mean VAS in Propofol group was significantly higher than DEX group. Mean of surgeon satisfaction in the DEX group was significantly higher than Propofol group. In general, it can be said that patients with Parkinson's disease, Dexmedetomidine is superior drug to Propofol to deep brain stimulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Faranak Behnaz & Mahshid Ghasemi & Yalda Shabanpour, 2018. "Comparison of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Duration of Starting Tremor after Drug discontinuation in Parkinson's Patients under Deep Brain stimulation," Journal of Molecular Biology Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmbrjl:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jmbr/article/download/72753/39893
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jmbr/article/view/72753
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmbrjl:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.