IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmbrjl/v10y2020i1p176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Periodontal Status between Hookah and Cigarette Smokers

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Ali Banihashem Rad
  • Mohammad Bagheri Iraj
  • Majid Sanat Khani
  • Zahra Saeedi
  • Seyed Ahmad Banihashem Rad
  • Hadi Yasamani
  • Amir Movahhedian

Abstract

Background and Objective- Inhalation of chemicals and toxins in cigarette and hookah smoke results in loss of integrity of oral cavity tissues. The objective of this study was to compare the periodontal health of hookah and cigarette smokers. Materials and Methods- In this study, 73 men at the age group of 20-35 years who smoked hookah for more than 5 years and 73 men at the same age who smoked cigarette for more than 5 years and 73 healthy men referred to the periodontal department of Mashhad dentistry school were selected and studied. Periodontal indices including pocket depth, GI, BOP, CAL were assessed in two groups. Also, using parallel periapical radiography, mesial and distal marginal bone level around the first molar tooth was measured. Finally, the data were assessed and compared using appropriate statistical analysis. Results- Pocket depth was 24.27% and 23.62%, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers, and it was 0.96% in healthy subjects, clinical attachment level was 4.48 and 4.41 mm, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers, and it was 0.77 mm in healthy subjects. Gingival index (GI) was 1.40 and 1.42, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers and it was 0.52 in healthy subjects, BOP value ​​was 6.52 and 6.52%, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers and it was 10.86% in healthy subjects. Mesial marginal bone level of first lower molar tooth was 2.27 and 2.32 mm, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers and it was 1.74 mm in healthy subjects and distal marginal bone level of lower first molar tooth was 2.38 and 2.35 mm, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers and it was 1.75 mm in healthy subjects. Comparison of results between the two groups of cigarette smokers and hookah smokers did not show any significant relationship in any of the variables, but there was a significant relationship between the two groups and the healthy group (P <0.001). Conclusion- Periodontal parameters in healthy individuals are significantly better than those of smokers. Also, although there is a relationship between cigarette smoking and hookah smoking and periodontal parameters, these two groups do not show a significant difference in terms of periodontal parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Ali Banihashem Rad & Mohammad Bagheri Iraj & Majid Sanat Khani & Zahra Saeedi & Seyed Ahmad Banihashem Rad & Hadi Yasamani & Amir Movahhedian, 2020. "Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Periodontal Status between Hookah and Cigarette Smokers," Journal of Molecular Biology Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 176-176, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmbrjl:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jmbr/article/download/0/0/44349/46753
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jmbr/article/view/0/44349
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmbrjl:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.