IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jfrjnl/v9y2021i5p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of the Protective Effect of Cola anomala and Coffea arabica Against Induced Toxicity in Rats

Author

Listed:
  • M-A. Angie Mbong
  • F. L. Ebouel Edoun
  • L. C. Manga Ngandi
  • J. A. Fotso Youvop
  • R. Orang Orang
  • H. M. Fotso Tienoue
  • F. Ngalla Nwang
  • J. L. Ngondi
  • J. Oben

Abstract

This work was aimed at evaluating the effects of C. anomala and C. arabica on Methotrexate (MTX) induced metabolic disorders. For this, the aqueous extract (AE) of C. anomala and C. arabica were prepared and their polyphenols, flavonoids and alkaloids contents determined as well as their antiradical and total antioxidant capacity. An animal experimentation using female rats was carried out for 14 days. Rats were divided into 6 groups; a negative control group receiving water; a positive control group receiving 12mg/Kg Bw of MTX; four tests groups receiving 12mg/Kg Bw of MTX and one of the extracts at a dose of 200mg/Kg Bw or 400mg/Kg Bw. At the end of the experiment, plasmas and hemolysates were prepared as well as liver and kidney homogenates for the evaluation of oxidative status (catalase, total protein and malondialdehyde (MDA)), liver toxicity (alanine amino transferase (ALT)) and renal toxicity (creatinine and urea) and lipid profile (triglycerides, total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol). Weight gain in extract-treated rats was better with the C. anomala. Concerning oxidative status, MDA levels were generally lower in C. anomala-treated groups compared to C. arabica while catalase level was higher in C. anomala-treated rats. As for lipid profile, it is C. arabica that showed more or less better results. Both extracts led to an amelioration of toxicity markers compared to exclusive treatment with MTX. The results of this study suggest that C. anomala and C. arabica may reduce metabolic disorders associated with the intake of MTX during cancer treatment; C. anomala protecting better C. arabica.

Suggested Citation

  • M-A. Angie Mbong & F. L. Ebouel Edoun & L. C. Manga Ngandi & J. A. Fotso Youvop & R. Orang Orang & H. M. Fotso Tienoue & F. Ngalla Nwang & J. L. Ngondi & J. Oben, 2021. "Comparative Study of the Protective Effect of Cola anomala and Coffea arabica Against Induced Toxicity in Rats," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 1-1, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jfrjnl:v:9:y:2021:i:5:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/article/download/0/0/43293/45359
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/article/view/0/43293
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jfrjnl:v:9:y:2021:i:5:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.