IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jfrjnl/v12y2023i4p18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aroma Comparison between Plant-based Hamburgers and Traditional Beef Hamburgers

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua D. Zyzak
  • Nathaniel A. Britt
  • Lucy E. Jones
  • Phillip K. Gilbert
  • Callie E. Boggs
  • Li Li Zyzak

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in aroma in the many plant-based hamburger analogues in the market today when compared with traditional beef hamburger. For that purpose, we investigated the aroma components using headspace gas chromatography-olfactometry and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry analytical methods. The lipid-derived aldehydes and Maillard reaction compounds were key contributors to the characteristic aroma of a beef hamburger. And that most of the plant-based burgers in the market today were unable to replicate that profile. The plant-based meat analogues displayed a more roasted odor character with higher pyrazine levels and then many show evidence to the addition of other flavor compounds and spices to give the perception of a flavored meat analogue. These approaches resulted in higher flavor intensity; however, the result was something very sensorially different than the sweet, juicy, buttery, and meaty character of beef hamburger. Based on these findings, replication of the characteristic aroma of beef hamburger is complex. This work provides new insights into the key aroma contributors of beef hamburgers and the challenges that exist in trying to replicate it with plant-based meat analogues.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua D. Zyzak & Nathaniel A. Britt & Lucy E. Jones & Phillip K. Gilbert & Callie E. Boggs & Li Li Zyzak, 2023. "Aroma Comparison between Plant-based Hamburgers and Traditional Beef Hamburgers," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jfrjnl:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/article/download/0/0/49272/53170
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/article/view/0/49272
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jfrjnl:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.