IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jfrjnl/v10y2021i3p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemical Characterization and Acceptability of Eight Cassava Varieties Introduced in Rwanda

Author

Listed:
  • Marguerite Niyibituronsa
  • Jean Bosco Shingiro
  • Madjaliwa Nzamwita
  • Lea Ndilu
  • Gerardine Nyirahanganyamunsi
  • Gregoire Hagenimana
  • Concilie Nyirahorana
  • Severin Ntivuguruzwa
  • Parfait Gasana
  • Illuminee Kamaraba
  • Usabyembabazi Madeleine
  • Elvis Nkundanyirazo
  • Gervais Gashaka
  • Jean Claude Izamuhaye
  • Charles Bucagu
  • Athanase Nduwumuremyi
  • Patrick Karangwa

Abstract

Cassava is a staple food and an important and cheap source of carbohydrate in Rwanda. However, the nature and chemical composition of cassava roots limit its proper use as food due to its toxicity and short shelf life. The cyanogenic glucosides found in the cassava roots are responsible for the toxicity. The aim of the study was to characterize the chemical profile and consumer acceptability of paste from eight cassava varieties processed into flour using four processing methods. The cassava samples were harvested from trials conducted at Rubona Station of Rwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board. Four processing methods were used, namely, Cassava grated fermented, Cassava roots fermented, Cassava grated no fermented and Cassava roots no fermented. Pressing was done before drying the products to obtain the flour. At each stage of processing, the samples were prepared for laboratory analysis of dry mater, titratable acidity, cyanhydric acid and crude fiber by Rwanda Standards Board laboratory. Cassava flour was made into paste and sensory evaluation was conducted to evaluate the acceptability of the eight cassava varieties. The sensory attributes for the Ugali tested was significantly different (P<0.05). The method of grating before fermentation gave the most tasty Ugali than cassava root fermented. The more prefered varieties were GAHENE/2 and SEMAK 150/452 followed by BULK 13, MH95/0091 and NASE 14. The chemical analysis done for the 8 cassava varieties flour from the 4 processing methods exhibited the acceptable acidity and the NASE 14, Gahene/2 and Bulk 13 had the lowest cyanide hydrogen.

Suggested Citation

  • Marguerite Niyibituronsa & Jean Bosco Shingiro & Madjaliwa Nzamwita & Lea Ndilu & Gerardine Nyirahanganyamunsi & Gregoire Hagenimana & Concilie Nyirahorana & Severin Ntivuguruzwa & Parfait Gasana & Il, 2021. "Chemical Characterization and Acceptability of Eight Cassava Varieties Introduced in Rwanda," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-1, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jfrjnl:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/article/download/0/0/44987/47628
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/article/view/0/44987
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jfrjnl:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.