IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jfrjnl/v10y2021i2p47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Healthier Beverage Choice is Based on a Subjective Assessment of Sweet Taste

Author

Listed:
  • Ester Reijnen
  • Swen J. Kuhne
  • Reto Ritter

Abstract

Despite promising interventions to lower people’s daily sugar consumption, such as health- or taste-focused labels, the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) continues to rise. To improve the effectiveness of existing labels, the way people process sugar amounts in grams (g) as displayed on beverages seems to merit elucidation. For example, do people perceive the difference in the amount of sugar, and thus in the subjective sweet taste, between two beverages according to Weber’s law? Additionally, is that perceived difference the cause of their beverage choice? In order to investigate these questions, participants in this online experiment first had to estimate the sugar difference between two beverages based on grams and then decide whether they would switch to a lower-sugar beverage. We found that participants’ different estimates followed Weber’s law. The choice of the lower-sugar beverage, however, depended on how large they personally perceived that difference. In other words, the choice was independent of the ratio. These results show that future labels, rather than indicating the total amount of sugar, should indicate whether the reduction, for example in the amount of sugar compared to another beverage, was perceived as significant by others.

Suggested Citation

  • Ester Reijnen & Swen J. Kuhne & Reto Ritter, 2021. "A Healthier Beverage Choice is Based on a Subjective Assessment of Sweet Taste," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 1-47, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jfrjnl:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/article/download/0/0/44878/47481
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/article/view/0/44878
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jfrjnl:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.