IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jedpjl/v7y2017i1p229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Correlates of Business Undergraduates’ Closed Versus Open Grading Assessment Learning Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Blau
  • Misty Blessley
  • Matthew Kunkle
  • Michael Schirmer
  • Howard Keen

Abstract

Motivated by a lack of scales for measuring business undergraduates’ grading assessment learning perceptions (GALP), this research created two three-item GALP scales, closed and open. Two separate samples of senior business undergraduates (fall, 2015, n = 220 and spring, 2016, n = 690) were used. Closed GALP and open GALP were identified via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Subsequent stepwise regression analyses consistently showed that satisfaction/reputation had a positive impact and accounted for the most variance in these two GALP scales across both samples. Research limitations and future research issues are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Blau & Misty Blessley & Matthew Kunkle & Michael Schirmer & Howard Keen, 2017. "Exploring Correlates of Business Undergraduates’ Closed Versus Open Grading Assessment Learning Perceptions," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(1), pages 229-229, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jedpjl:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jedp/article/download/66319/36415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jedp/article/view/66319
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jedpjl:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.