IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v5y2013i5p158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Nebraska Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Populations to Dicamba

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Crespo
  • Mark Bernards
  • Greg Kruger
  • Donald Lee
  • Robert Wilson

Abstract

Dicamba-resistant soybeans are being developed to provide an additional herbicide mechanism-of-action for postemergence weed control in soybean. Numerous broadleaf species, including horseweed, have evolved resistance to glyphosate. It is anticipated that dicamba will be used by farmers as a primary tool to manage these weeds. Studying and understanding variability in horseweed response to dicamba will aid in developing appropriate risk management strategies to extend the utility of the dicamba-resistance technology. Horseweed plants from ten Nebraska populations were treated with one of nine doses of dicamba in greenhouse experiments. At 28 days after treatment (DAT) visual injury estimations were made and plants were harvested to determine dry weight. There was a three-fold difference in the I90 (90% visual injury estimate) between the least (638 g ha-1) and most (205 g ha-1) susceptible populations. Two plants from five populations were observed for an additional three months. No plants treated at doses above 280 g ha-1 survived to set seeds. These results suggest that maintaining use doses of 560 g ha-1 or greater may fully control horseweed populations from Nebraska and minimize the risk of plants surviving to set seed, in addition to practicing other proven herbicide-resistance management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Crespo & Mark Bernards & Greg Kruger & Donald Lee & Robert Wilson, 2013. "Response of Nebraska Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Populations to Dicamba," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(5), pages 158-158, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2013:i:5:p:158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/24485/16235
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/24485
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2013:i:5:p:158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.