IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v18y2026i6p1.html

Evaluation of Clethodim, Glufosinate, and Glyphosate Alone and in Tank-Mix with Residual Herbicides for Control of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Shoots and Rhizomes

Author

Listed:
  • Taghi Bararpour

Abstract

Johnsongrass is one of the most difficult weeds to control due to its ability to regenerate from underground rhizomes. Johnsongrass has been a problematic weed for years in row crops in Mississippi. It can severely reduce yields in corn, cotton, soybean, and other row cropping systems. Two separate field studies were conducted in 2023 at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, Mississippi to evaluate the effectiveness of clethodim, glufosinate, and glyphosate applied alone or tank-mixed with residual herbicides for johnsongrass rhizomes and seedlings control. No crops were included in this study, as it was carried out under non‑crop conditions. The experiment was conducted as a randomized complete block design with 12 herbicide treatments and three replications in a natural johnsongrass population (rhizomes and seedlings). Herbicide treatments included clethodim, glyphosate, and glufosinate applied alone or tank‑mixed with the residual herbicides brake, boundary, or acuron for control of johnsongrass rhizomes and seedlings. Johnsongrass shoot control from the application of clethodim alone was 83% four-weeks after application. Antagonism occurred when boundary or acuron were mixed with clethodim which reduced aboveground biomass control. Both glyphosate and glufosinate, whether applied alone or with residual herbicides, maintained excellent shoot control (>96%) with no evidence of antagonism. Four weeks after application, the entire test area was mowed down (after final johnsongrass evaluation) for possible johnsongrass regrowth. Johnsongrass regrowth was observed following all treatments except the glyphosate application. The residual herbicides brake, boundary, and acuron did not improve clethodim or glufosinate performance in preventing johnsongrass regrowth from rhizomes. Glyphosate alone or tank-mixed with residual herbicides were the only treatments that provided 100% of johnsongrass control with no-regrowth.

Suggested Citation

  • Taghi Bararpour, 2026. "Evaluation of Clethodim, Glufosinate, and Glyphosate Alone and in Tank-Mix with Residual Herbicides for Control of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Shoots and Rhizomes," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(6), pages 1-1, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/53240/58065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/53240
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.