IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v18y2026i4p43.html

Validation of the QUEFTS Model for Predicting Fertilizer Requirements in Maize and Common Beans

Author

Listed:
  • Kalima Jerrine Kabanda
  • Jones Yengwe
  • Hendrix Chalwe
  • Elijah Phiri
  • Obed I. Lungu

Abstract

Inherently low soil fertility continues to constrain crop productivity among smallholder farmers in Zambia. To remedy this, fertilizer application is often guided by blanket recommendations that fail to account for differences in soil nutrient supply and crop demand. The Quantitative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils (QUEFTS) model can estimate balanced nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium requirements, but its performance when calibrated using rapid soil testing kit data remains limited. This study validated QUEFTS-based recommendations for maize and common beans using soil data obtained from a rapid soil testing kit. On-farm trials were conducted at 12 farmer-managed sites and one researcher-managed site during the 2024/2025 season. Fertilizer treatments included QUEFTS-generated rates, a blanket rate (current practice), and control (no fertilizer) treatments. Significant treatment effects were observed for maize grain yields and biomass (p < 0.001) with the QUEFTS treatment producing the highest mean grain yield (5.6 t ha-1), followed by the blanket rate (4.8 t ha-1) and the control (3.2 t ha-1). For common beans, grain yield under QUEFTS was significantly higher than the control but not different from the blanket treatment, while aboveground biomass did not vary among treatments. Model evaluation indicated moderate predictive performance for maize (RMSE = 1.91 and d = 0.41) but overestimated the bean yield. These findings indicate that integrating rapid soil testing with the QUEFTS model can improve site-specific fertilizer management in maize although further refinement is required for common beans under variable field conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalima Jerrine Kabanda & Jones Yengwe & Hendrix Chalwe & Elijah Phiri & Obed I. Lungu, 2026. "Validation of the QUEFTS Model for Predicting Fertilizer Requirements in Maize and Common Beans," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(4), pages 1-43, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/52933/57718
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/52933
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.