Author
Listed:
- Helen V. Corales
- Hisako Nomura
- Yoshifumi Takahashi
- Mitsuyasu Yabe
Abstract
Smallholder pig farmers’ decision to adopt a vaccination strategy can be effective in managing threats associated with endemic infectious diseases in pig production. However, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding farmers’ voluntary use of vaccines to reduce the burden of endemic pig diseases. This indicates that a better understanding of farmers’ decisions to adopt disease management strategies is necessary. To determine the prevalence of voluntary veterinary vaccine use among smallholder pig farmers, we administered a survey using a multiple price list approach paired with a structured questionnaire to 141 pig raisers in Pampanga, Philippines. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with level of voluntary vaccine use. Results show a moderate voluntary uptake of veterinary vaccines among smallholder pig raisers at 51.7%, with 41.8% using one type of veterinary vaccine and 9.9% using two types. This estimate is higher than figures reported in other countries, suggesting that smallholder pig farmers value the benefits derived from vaccination despite limited government support. The study also demonstrates that risk preference affects farmers’ decisions to use veterinary vaccines. Risk preference should be taken into consideration in developing strategies to deliver knowledge and support about animal vaccines. For instance, risk seeking farmers may require targeted support to adopt more than one veterinary vaccine strategy. It is evident that smallholder pig farmers need considerable guidance and support to choose effective strategies for managing production diseases, thereby enabling their continued participation in the swine sector.
Suggested Citation
Helen V. Corales & Hisako Nomura & Yoshifumi Takahashi & Mitsuyasu Yabe, 2025.
"Determinants of Voluntary Vaccination Against Endemic Infectious Pig Diseases in the Philippines,"
Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(8), pages 1-28, July.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:28
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.