IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v17y2025i10p79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical, Allocative, and Economic Efficiency and Profitability of Black Soldier Fly Farming Among Smallholder Farmers in Selected Counties in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Elvis Omondi
  • Margret W. Ngigi
  • Joel O. Khobondo

Abstract

Black Soldier Fly (BSF) has emerged as a source of protein and frass fertiliser, while also helping reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Despite promising opportunities in BSF farming, low production levels, labour-intensive technologies, limited input resources, and rearing systems hinder the optimization, consumption, and marketing of BSF and its products. Therefore, the study aimed to determine the technical, allocative, and economic efficiency and profitability of BSF farming among smallholder farmers in selected counties in Kenya. Guided by the production theory of the firm and profit maximization theory, the research analysed secondary data from 373 smallholder BSF farmers across 12 counties in Kenya, collected by the National Agricultural Value Chain Development Project (NAVCDP) in June and July 2024. Data analysis was conducted using STATA software version 17.0, employing Cobb-Douglas stochastic frontier production and cost functions, a two-limit Tobit regression model, and metrics such as gross profit margin (GPM), return on investment (ROI), and benefit-cost ratio (BCR). The results showed that the average technical efficiency was 72%, allocative efficiency was 56%, and economic efficiency was 40%, indicating that farmers in the study area were generally inefficient in their production activities. Additionally, factors such as experience, credit access, source of income, structure size, herd size, feeding times, organic waste feeds, substrate bought, agro-weather information services, output market access, and transport services significantly affected the efficiency of BSF farming. Profitability analysis revealed that production and sales of both BSF larvae and frass fertiliser yielded higher profits, with GPM, ROI, and BCR of 51.41%, 8.77%, and 1.18, respectively, compared to selling only larvae or only frass. The study recommends that the government and other development partners develop good-quality feeder roads, establish public markets, and provide grants to farmers. Farmers should also join co-operatives and informal credit/savings groups to access credit.

Suggested Citation

  • Elvis Omondi & Margret W. Ngigi & Joel O. Khobondo, 2025. "Technical, Allocative, and Economic Efficiency and Profitability of Black Soldier Fly Farming Among Smallholder Farmers in Selected Counties in Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(10), pages 1-79, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/52168/56806
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/52168
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.