IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v7y2015i4p70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Archery: Emotion Intensity Regulation to Stay in the Zone during Olympic Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Jolly Roy
  • Edin Suwarganda

Abstract

Understanding emotional influence that affect sport performance in archery helps to design the appropriate intervention in athlete’s preparation. The present study examined the effect of emotion intensity from four Olympic level recurve archers on error scores and performance outcomes; compared individual emotion intensities of three competing archers during Olympic competition with previously established individual optimal zone; and examined the influence of being “in or out of individual zone†relating the archer’s achievement with the individual target set by the coach and performance outcome during Olympic competition. The results revealed that unpleasant dysfunctional emotion (N-) had the most influence on performance score. The in-out of zone results derived from the archers data lend support to emotion-performance relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolly Roy & Edin Suwarganda, 2015. "Archery: Emotion Intensity Regulation to Stay in the Zone during Olympic Competition," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 1-70, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/52688/29088
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/52688
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.