IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v7y2015i2p146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insisting on Depression, but not Showing Symptoms: A Japanese Study of Excuse-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Itsuki Yamakawa
  • Shinji Sakamoto

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, Japanese psychiatrists have reported the appearance of a Modern Type Depression (MTD), which has different features from melancholic depression. Using a case vignette method, we looked at one of the distinctive features of MTD; that is, “insisting on depression†. In particular, we examined whether the statement “I think I may have depressive disorder†can be accepted as an excuse for not fulfilling ones’ duty when one does not show any symptoms of depressive disorder. Participants comprised 344 Japanese undergraduates who were presented with a short scenario describing social predicaments and who subsequently assessed the excuse value in terms of impression and behavioral reaction on the transgressor. Results showed that even though the transgressor did not show any symptoms of depressive disorder, insisting that one may have depressive disorder seemed to be accepted. Additionally, consistent with Weiner’s cognitive (attribution)–emotion–action model, the more positive impressions observers have on the transgressor, the more they are motivated to react kindly to the transgressor. Some unexpected findings and limitations of the present study were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Itsuki Yamakawa & Shinji Sakamoto, 2015. "Insisting on Depression, but not Showing Symptoms: A Japanese Study of Excuse-Making," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(2), pages 146-146, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/44698/26636
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/44698
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.