IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v5y2013i4p69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing Cognitive Load in Learning by Analogy

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsey Richland
  • Janice Hansen

Abstract

The ability to draw connections between concepts, problems, or representations is crucial to mathematicalproficiency, though teachers face challenges in capitalizing on classroom opportunities to develop suchconnected thinking. An experiment with fifth-grade students tests theoretically grounded cuing strategies forsupporting learning from instructional analogies. Posttest results indicate that an analogy between division ofnatural numbers and rational numbers improved students’ proficiency in dividing fractions regardless of theaddition of analogical cuing strategies, but that the additional cuing led to more conceptual, flexible problemsolving. These cuing strategies may be effective ways to enhance students’ ability to draw connections acrossmathematics and capitalize on classroom learning opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsey Richland & Janice Hansen, 2013. "Reducing Cognitive Load in Learning by Analogy," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(4), pages 1-69, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/25611/18751
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/25611
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.