IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v3y2011i2p156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Age-related Decline in Vocal Emotion Identification an Artefact of Labelling Cognitions?

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Mitchell
  • Rachel Kingston

Abstract

Evidence has emerged that older adults find it more difficult to interpret prosodic emotions than younger adults.However, typical tasks involve labelling-related cognitions over and above emotion perception per se. Accordingly, we aimed to determine if age-related difficulty in prosodic emotion labelling extended to discrimination, which is more closely related to emotion perception per se. For this purpose, 45 younger adults(mean age 20 years, 2 males/43 females) and 45 older adults (mean age 71 years, 16 males/29 females) were recruited. In one task, participants heard pairs of sentences and were asked to indicate whether they were spoken with the same emotional intonational or not. In a second task, they heard sentences with intonation conveying a question or statement, and indicated whether the non-emotional intonation patterns matched or not. Older adults’ performance consistently fell below that of younger adults. Older adults may have a generic prosodic decoding deficit, regardless of the end function of the prosody.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Mitchell & Rachel Kingston, 2011. "Is Age-related Decline in Vocal Emotion Identification an Artefact of Labelling Cognitions?," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(2), pages 156-156, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/11166/9184
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/11166
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.