IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v2y2010i2p41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reaction Times and Deception - the Lying Constant

Author

Listed:
  • Martin R. Sheridan
  • Kenneth A. Flowers

Abstract

The cognitive theory of lie detection suggests that it takes longer on average to formulate a deliberately falseresponse than a truthful one because it requires the truth to first be known and then altered, adding an extracomponent to the response process. This concept was upheld in a modified form in three experiments wheresubjects indicated as quickly as possible whether presented numbers were higher or lower than a given standardnumber, and to “lie†(give the wrong answer deliberately) on half the trials. Results suggested that lying adds aconstant additional time to reaction times (RTs) independently of other factors such as the complexity of thecognitive task or method of response. Additionally, true Yes RTs were shorter than true No ones, producing aninteraction with the lying constant such that RTs could reliably distinguish truth from lies for Yes responses butnot so easily for No responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin R. Sheridan & Kenneth A. Flowers, 2010. "Reaction Times and Deception - the Lying Constant," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(2), pages 1-41, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/6498/6362
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/6498
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.