Author
Listed:
- Ananya Singh
- Palak Parashar
- Indu Yadav
Abstract
The study aimed to assess the impact of intolerance to uncertainty, fatigue, and decision-making styles among adults. The present study addresses the existing gap in examining these variables simultaneously. Uncertainty and fatigue are key factors that determine the quality of decision-making engagement and the approach an individual opts for. Data of 226 adults, between the age group of 18–43, was used as they include the population of both emerging adults and millennials. For this cross-sectional survey design, standardized scales such as the Intolerance to Uncertainty Short Form (IU-SF), General Decision-Making Style (GDMS), and Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) were used. Data were analysed using SPSS through descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and linear regression. Results showed that intolerance to uncertainty had a significant positive relationship with fatigue, as well as with avoidant and dependent decision-making styles. Fatigue demonstrated a negative correlation with the rational style and positive correlations with avoidant and dependent styles. Regression analysis indicated that intolerance to uncertainty significantly predicted avoidant and dependent decision-making, while fatigue negatively predicted rational style and positively predicted dependent style, although the effect sizes were small. Intuitive and spontaneous styles were unaffected by uncertainty and fatigue, suggesting that these rely more on instinctive and immediate reactions rather than cognitive or emotional factors. The findings highlight the complex nature of decision-making under uncertain and fatiguing conditions.
Suggested Citation
Ananya Singh & Palak Parashar & Indu Yadav, 2025.
"The Impact of Intolerance to Uncertainty, Fatigue and Decision-Making Styles Among Adults,"
International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(3), pages 1-33, September.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:33
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.