IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v21y2026i4p39.html

Analyzing Almond Production Costs for a Small Farm in California Using Accounting Management Method

Author

Listed:
  • Pei Xu
  • Morelia Santana

Abstract

California's Central Valley produces approximately 80% of the world’s almonds but has faced significant acreage reductions due to stricter Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) mandates, rising production costs, and declining wholesale prices. Economic evidence is essential for almond growers to make informed farm-level decisions using accounting management methods. This study uses estimated cost data from a hypothetical 100-acre research orchard in California’s Central Valley in 2025 and applies accounting management methods to estimate per-acre operational and long-term investment costs. The study conducts breakeven, capital budgeting, sensitivity, and discounted cash flow analyses. Results show that- 1) from a wholesale price perspective, almond production cannot effectively break even in the short run when prices fall below approximately $4.50 per pound; 2) annual operating costs averaged approximately $10,343 per acre, including variable and fixed costs; 3) long-term investment analysis shows that without a down payment, almond growers face substantial annual investment costs associated with irrigation infrastructure, orchard establishment, and land acquisition, totaling approximately $276,660 annually ($2,767 per acre) for a 100-acre operation; and 4) under a 20% down payment scenario, annual investment costs decline to approximately $248,132 annually ($2,481 per acre), but long-term profitability remains highly sensitive to financing structure and land costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei Xu & Morelia Santana, 2026. "Analyzing Almond Production Costs for a Small Farm in California Using Accounting Management Method," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 21(4), pages 1-39, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:21:y:2026:i:4:p:39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/53372/58223
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/53372
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:21:y:2026:i:4:p:39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.