Author
Abstract
This study examines the mainstreaming of metrology as a means of strengthening consumer protection in Tanzania, with particular emphasis on enforcement challenges within the national quality infrastructure system. Guided by international standards and best practices advanced by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), the International Organisation of Legal Metrology (OIML), particularly OIML D.1-2020 (E), and the East African Community Standardisation, Quality Assurance, Metrology and Testing Act, 2006, the study adopts a qualitative research approach to evaluate Tanzania's legal and institutional framework. The findings suggest that, although the Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) and the Weights and Measures Agency (WMA) are the principal institutions responsible for standardisation and legal metrology, enforcement is constrained by overlapping statutory mandates and fragmented institutional coordination. Both institutions perform inspection, certification, and aspects of conformity assessment, resulting in regulatory duplication, operational inefficiencies, increased compliance costs, and uncertainty among market participants. These institutional overlaps are inconsistent with internationally recognised principles that require clearly defined institutional responsibilities and coordinated quality infrastructure governance. The study further suggests that limited technical capacity, inadequate inter-agency collaboration, and weak market surveillance undermine regulatory enforcement and reduce the effectiveness of consumer protection measures. The study recommends the adoption of a comprehensive National Quality Policy to clarify institutional mandates, eliminate overlapping functions, strengthen coordination among quality infrastructure institutions, and promote integrated market surveillance and information sharing. The study also advocates capacity building and closer alignment with regional and international metrology standards and best practices to improve regulatory efficiency, measurement accuracy, consumer confidence, fair trade, and sustainable consumer protection in Tanzania.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:21:y:2026:i:4:p:253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.