IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v20y2025i2p1.html

An Application Framework for the Loss Aversion Distribution: Insights for Marketing, Education, and Digital Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Koh
  • Zulkifli Jalil

Abstract

This paper introduces a structured framework for applying the Loss Aversion Distribution (LAD) model, a novel approach to understanding time-sensitive decision-making behaviors influenced by loss aversion. The LAD model provides actionable insights for industries by capturing how perceived value diminishes over time, optimizing pricing strategies, improving student performance, and enhancing digital adoption within organizations. Specifically, LAD is applied to consumer pricing strategies, helping businesses determine optimal discounting approaches for perishable goods based on consumers’ loss-averse purchasing behavior; student study behavior, identifying patterns in procrastination and urgency before final examinations to support targeted educational interventions; and digital adoption in workplaces, addressing employees' resistance to new technologies by predicting adoption trends and informing change management strategies. By providing a generalizable and adaptable framework, LAD bridges the gap between behavioral economics and practical decision-making, making it a valuable tool for businesses, educators, and policymakers seeking to enhance outcomes in time-sensitive environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Koh & Zulkifli Jalil, 2025. "An Application Framework for the Loss Aversion Distribution: Insights for Marketing, Education, and Digital Adoption," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 20(2), pages 1-1, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:20:y:2025:i:2:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/51261/55661
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/51261
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    2. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zvi Winer & Yitzhak Samuel, 2018. "The paradox of cost minimization and the survival of organizations," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 401-421, September.
    2. Susan A. Brown & Viswanath Venkatesh & Sandeep Goyal, 2012. "Expectation Confirmation in Technology Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 474-487, June.
    3. Wang, Zhan-ao & Samuel, Ribeiro-Navarrete & Chen, Xiao-qian & Xu, Bing & Huang, Wei-lun, 2023. "Central bank digital currencies: Consumer data-driven sustainable operation management policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Bradley, Ian, 2003. "The representative bettor, bet size, and prospect theory," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 409-413, March.
    5. Michael R. CARTER & Alain de JANVRY & Elisabeth SADOULET & Alexandros SARRIS, 2014. "Index-based weather insurance for developing countries: A review of evidence and a set of propositions for up-scaling," Working Papers P111, FERDI.
    6. Wesam Fallatah & Joakim Kävrestad & Steven Furnell, 2024. "Establishing a Model for the User Acceptance of Cybersecurity Training," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-12, August.
    7. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    8. Aurélien Baillon & Yoram Halevy & Chen Li, 2022. "Experimental elicitation of ambiguity attitude using the random incentive system," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 1002-1023, June.
    9. Sweksha Srivastava & Abha Aggarwal, 2025. "The Efficiency Analysis and Ranking Employing Data Envelopment Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Incorporating Cumulative Prospect Theory," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 1-34, September.
    10. Saeideh Sharifi fard & Ezhar Tamam & Md Salleh Hj Hassan & Moniza Waheed & Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, 2016. "Factors affecting Malaysian university students’ purchase intention in social networking sites," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1182612-118, December.
    11. Robert Sugden, 2022. "Debiasing or regularisation? Two interpretations of the concept of ‘true preference’ in behavioural economics," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 765-784, April.
    12. Marjan Shamsi & Tatiana Iakovleva & Espen Olsen & Richard P. Bagozzi, 2021. "Employees’ Work-Related Well-Being during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model and JD-R Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Patrick Beissner & Tim Boonen & Mario Ghossoub, 2026. "Betting under Common Beliefs: The Effect of Probability Weighting," Papers 2602.24194, arXiv.org.
    14. Heiko Karle & Georg Kirchsteiger & Martin Peitz, 2015. "Loss Aversion and Consumption Choice: Theory and Experimental Evidence," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 101-120, May.
    15. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    16. Muhammad Kashif & Thomas Leirvik, 2022. "The MAX Effect in an Oil Exporting Country: The Case of Norway," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Jonathan Meng & Feng Fu, 2020. "Understanding Gambling Behavior and Risk Attitudes Using Cryptocurrency-based Casino Blockchain Data," Papers 2008.05653, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    18. Zhang, Kai & Cheng, Xiaoting, 2025. "Determinants of consumers’ intentions to use smart home devices from the perspective of perceived value: A mixed SEM, NCA, and fsQCA study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    20. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Gusti Ayu Novi Yutami, I, 2014. "Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 336-349.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:20:y:2025:i:2:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.