IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v11y2015i1p181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences among Different DGBLs Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Ling Lin

Abstract

Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL) not only offers ideal learning results but also encourages students to be proactive in their learning. In this research, DGBL and Means-end Chains have been chosen as the theoretical basis for the study. The study took a look at the discrepancies in value between students of different majors and competition participation experiences. Business and Management major students felt that Virtual chips could Reduce pressure and accountability and in addition to allowing them to gradually Accumulate investment experience and Reduce the error rate, it would give them more opportunities to Practice for financial planning. In contrast, students who major in Finance emphasized the consequences of Practice for financial planning from the attribute of Diverse investment tools for virtual trading and Enhanced team learning through Team work. With regards to competition experience, students with competition experience preferred to achieve the learning consequences of Increased practical experience and Accumulated investment experience through the Digital learning function and Virtual platform and they achieved the terminal value of Sense of security through Reducing the error rate. For students with no prior competition experience, they expected to gain opportunities for Practice for financial planning through virtual trading games with Diverse investment tools in order to pursue the terminal values of Sense of achievement and Fun and enjoyment of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Ling Lin, 2015. "Differences among Different DGBLs Learners," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 181-181, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:11:y:2015:i:1:p:181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/52445/29878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/52445
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:11:y:2015:i:1:p:181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.