IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v18y2025i6p83.html

Older Worker Engagement in the 21st Century as Measured by EENDEED: Who, What, and Why!

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip M. Randall
  • Susan Saurage-Altenloh
  • Tywanda D. Tate
  • Franklin M. Lartey

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of the US workforce, the participation of older adults has garnered increasing attention. While much research has highlighted the engagement of individuals aged 50 and above, a significant gap remains in the literature regarding the engagement of those aged 65 and above. This paper aims to fill this gap by investigating the extent of engagement and the factors that drive engagement among individuals aged 65 and above. Advances in healthcare, shifts in retirement policies, and a desire for continued contribution and engagement play crucial roles in this trend. By examining employment patterns, motivations, and the unique challenges this age group faces, the study aims to highlight the significant yet often overlooked impact of this age group on the modern workplace. The research utilizes the EENDEED measurement instrument to assess engagement levels and explores the theoretical frameworks of self-determination, self-efficacy, and social exchange. The findings reveal that income and gender significantly contribute to engagement levels, while education and years of experience have a limited impact. The study emphasizes the importance of recognizing and leveraging the strengths of older workers to create a more inclusive and productive work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip M. Randall & Susan Saurage-Altenloh & Tywanda D. Tate & Franklin M. Lartey, 2025. "Older Worker Engagement in the 21st Century as Measured by EENDEED: Who, What, and Why!," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(6), pages 1-83, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/52545/57227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/52545
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.