IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v18y2025i4p12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating User Adoption of Citizen Development Platform: A Case Study Using the Technology Acceptance Model

Author

Listed:
  • Norwin Bochmann
  • Heiko Moryson

Abstract

This study investigates user acceptance of a Citizen Development tool within a German energy company using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). As digital transformation accelerates across industries, empowering non-technical employees to create digital solutions through no-code platforms becomes increasingly relevant. The research applies TAM to analyze how perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and usage intention influence actual user acceptance of the tool. A quantitative survey was conducted with 177 employees, and data analysis was performed using SPSS and R Studio. The findings reveal that usage intention is the strongest predictor of user acceptance, explaining over 55% of the variance. Furthermore, both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly influence intention to use, with perceived usefulness having a greater impact. Perceived ease of use also has a moderate influence on perceived usefulness. These results confirm TAM's applicability in the energy sector and underline the importance of user-centered design and training. The study concludes with practical recommendations for enhancing digital adoption and highlights the potential for expanding the TAM framework to include additional variables. Limitations include a cross-sectional design, and a single-company focus, suggesting avenues for future longitudinal and cross-industry research.

Suggested Citation

  • Norwin Bochmann & Heiko Moryson, 2025. "Evaluating User Adoption of Citizen Development Platform: A Case Study Using the Technology Acceptance Model," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/51823/56376
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/51823
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.