IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v18y2025i3p33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging Perceptions and Knowledge Acquisition in Accounting: A Comparative Analysis of Learning Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Chara Kottara
  • Dimitra Kavalieraki-Foka
  • Sofia Asonitou

Abstract

The perception that students have towards accounting contributes significantly to whether they will learn and acquire accounting skills or not. This study investigates the relationship between students' perception of accounting and learning in the presence of a comparative environment involving traditional and blended learning environments. A survey questionnaire was administered to both groups of students in a Greek university and asked them to report demographic information, attitudes toward accounting, and self-assessed ability to perform main accounting functions. To assess learning outcomes, knowledge and skills tests were administered at the beginning and the end of the semester to both the traditional and blended learning groups. The findings show that blended learning students had better scores and perceived accounting as more applicable to their future careers and are more assured that they will be able to apply accounting concepts. They are more assured of performing accounting tasks than students who are not undertaking the blended learning environment. Blended learning also reduces perceived difficulty, which enhances the fun involved in learning. This study contributes to the new emerging literature in accounting education through the illustration of the impact of modes of instruction on students' knowledge acquisition. The findings illustrate that blended learning raises engagement and skill building, which reinforces its increasing adoption in accounting classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chara Kottara & Dimitra Kavalieraki-Foka & Sofia Asonitou, 2025. "Bridging Perceptions and Knowledge Acquisition in Accounting: A Comparative Analysis of Learning Methods," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(3), pages 1-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/51581/56078
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/51581
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.