IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v12y2019i1p148-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders’ Expectations on Human Capital Disclosure vs. Corporate Reporting Practice in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Salawati Sahari
  • Esmie Obrin Nichol
  • Suzila Mohamed Yusof

Abstract

Corporate disclosure of human capital has received growing research attention in different countries and markets. While past studies have explored the antecedent and implications of reporting human capital, studies on how far those disclosure practices actually meet the stakeholders’ expectations are still lacking. Hence, this study attempt to apply the stakeholder theory to frame the human capital reporting practices by the corporations in Malaysia. The methodology of this study is twofold; firstly, to develop human capital reporting measurement items as per the stakeholders’ expectation and their perceived importance of those items through a Delphi technique, and secondly, to determine the extent of human capital disclosure practices through a content analysis of the annual reports. The findings indicate that despite stakeholders’ high perceived importance on human capital disclosures, the corporate reporting practices are still at an inferior stage. This study contributes in such a way to fill the gap in the literature by exploring the current extent of human capital reporting by the listed corporations in Malaysia and how far such disclosure met the stakeholders’ expectations. This study also highlights the significance of the stakeholders’ voice and participation as one of the main driver towards sustainability reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Salawati Sahari & Esmie Obrin Nichol & Suzila Mohamed Yusof, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Expectations on Human Capital Disclosure vs. Corporate Reporting Practice in Malaysia," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 148-155, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:148-155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/37932/38384
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/37932
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Habib‐Uz‐Zaman Khan & Muhammad Azizul Islam & Johra Kayeser Fatima & Khadem Ahmed, 2011. "Corporate sustainability reporting of major commercial banks in line with GRI: Bangladesh evidence," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 347-362, August.
    2. Indra Abeysekera, 2008. "Motivations behind human capital disclosure in annual reports," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 16-29, March.
    3. Musa Mangena & Richard Pike, 2005. "The effect of audit committee shareholding, financial expertise and size on interim financial disclosures," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 327-349.
    4. Abeysekera, Indra, 2008. "Motivations behind human capital disclosure in annual reports," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 16-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salawati Sahari & Noradiva Hamzah & Mohamat Sabri Hassan & Mara Ridhuan Che Abdul Rahman, 2018. "The Development of a Human Rights Disclosure Index," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(5), pages 459-479, May.
    2. Barone, Elisabetta & Ranamagar, Nathan & Solomon, Jill F., 2013. "A Habermasian model of stakeholder (non)engagement and corporate (ir)responsibility reporting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 163-181.
    3. Nicoleta Maria Ienciu, 2012. "Theoretical Fundamentals of Human Factor," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 15(45), pages 247-264, September.
    4. Vandana Mehrotra & Amarjeet Kaur Malhotra & Rashmi Pant, 2018. "Intellectual Capital Disclosure by the Indian Corporate Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 376-392, April.
    5. Corinne Ollier Bessieux & Emmanuelle Negre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2022. "Moving from Accounting for People to Accounting with People: A Critical Analysis of the Literature and Avenues for Research," Post-Print hal-03889478, HAL.
    6. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Arcangelo Marrone & Michele Rubino, 2020. "The role of board of directors in intellectual capital disclosure after the advent of integrated reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2188-2200, September.
    7. K. Vithana & T. Soobaroyen & C. G. Ntim, 2021. "Human Resource Disclosures in UK Corporate Annual Reports: To What Extent Do These Reflect Organisational Priorities Towards Labour?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 475-497, March.
    8. Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul & Khan, Arifur & Belal, Ataur Rahman, 2015. "Intellectual capital disclosures and corporate governance: An empirical examination," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 219-227.
    9. Abeysekera, Indra, 2014. "Why do firms disclose and not disclose structural intangibles?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 381-393.
    10. Wu, Chloe Yu-Hsuan & Hsu, Hwa-Hsien & Haslam, Jim, 2016. "Audit committees, non-audit services, and auditor reporting decisions prior to failure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 240-256.
    11. Abdo, Hafez & Mangena, Musa & Needham, Graham & Hunt, David, 2018. "Disclosure of provisions for decommissioning costs in annual reports of oil and gas companies: A content analysis and stakeholder views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 341-358.
    12. Abdullah, Azrul Bin & Ismail, Ku Nor Izah Ku, 2018. "Hedging Activities Information and Risk Management Committee Effectiveness: Malaysian evidence," SocArXiv kxfqe, Center for Open Science.
    13. Orthodoxia Kyriacou & Jatin Pancholi & Angathevar Baskaran, 2010. "(Re)presentation of women in Indian accountancy bodies' web sites," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 329-352, August.
    14. Olaf Weber & Rezaul Karim Chowdury, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability in Bangladeshi Banks: Proactive or Reactive Ethical Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Cecilia Langella & Eugenio Anessi Pessina & Elena Cant?, 2020. "Caratteristiche e attivit? del Collegio Sindacale nelle aziende sanitarie pubbliche italiane," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(116), pages 53-73.
    16. Md. Abdul Kaium Masud & Mohammad Sharif Hossain & Jong Dae Kim, 2018. "Is Green Regulation Effective or a Failure: Comparative Analysis between Bangladesh Bank (BB) Green Guidelines and Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Hanene Ezzine, 2018. "Corporate governance and social norms during financial crisis: evidence from France and Saudi Arabia," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(3), pages 707-748, September.
    18. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    19. Hichem Khlif & Kamran Ahmed & Mohsen Souissi, 2017. "Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 376-403, August.
    20. Ioana Sofian & Mădălina Dumitru, 2017. "The Compliance of the Integrated Reports Issued by European Financial Companies with the International Integrated Reporting Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    human capital reporting; global reporting initiative; stakeholder theory; Delphi techniques; content analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange
    • F41 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Open Economy Macroeconomics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:148-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.