IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v9y2017i3p13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of a Regression Method to Reclassify Deaths Attributable to Heart Failure

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Metcalf
  • Michelle Meyer
  • Chirayath Suchindran
  • Gerardo Heiss

Abstract

BACKGROUND- Evaluation of cause-specific mortality for public health research depends on accurate death certificates and vital records. However, ill-defined causes of death (termed garbage codes), such as heart failure, are often listed as the underlying cause of death. We examined a regression method proposed by Ahern and colleagues for redistributing deaths attributed to heart failure and compared it to a simulation of the regression method by bootstrapping. METHODS- Deaths attributed to heart failure in four U.S. states (Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi and North Carolina) were redistributed to a set of underlying causes of death using regression models that identified the proportion of deaths for each target code within a given state-age-sex-education group using ICD-10 mortality data. The results were compared with 3,000 bootstrapped samples with replacement regression.RESULTS- The odds of death from heart failure in the population studied increased with age, was higher in whites and lower in decedents with greater than a high school education compared to those with less than high school education. There were 18 (29.0%) subgroups that showed no significant redistribution targets for the Ahern regression method and 28 (45.2%) for the bootstrapped regression method. Ischemic heart disease was a distribution target for 28 (45.2%) of the Ahern regression subgroups and 22 (35.5%) of the bootstrapped regression subgroups. The Ahern regression method and bootstrapped regression methods were discordant in 19 (30.6%) out of the 62 subgroups examined.CONCLUSION- The Ahern regression method tended to redistribute deaths attributed to heart failure to more target groups compared with the bootstrapped regression method. Both the Ahern regression and the bootstrap regression methods were computationally intensive and inefficient, and results appeared to be influenced by the choices of sex-age-education group strata. Other methods such as coarsened exact matching and improvements to the Ahern approach are desirable additions to the tools available to mitigate the impact of garbage codes on the accuracy of death certification.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Metcalf & Michelle Meyer & Chirayath Suchindran & Gerardo Heiss, 2017. "Assessment of a Regression Method to Reclassify Deaths Attributable to Heart Failure," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/58462/32874
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/58462
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.