IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v9y2017i12p56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Violence Risk Assessment in Forensic Nurses’ Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Interview Study

Author

Listed:
  • Helén Olsson
  • Lisbeth Kristiansen

Abstract

BACKGROUND- The legislation of Swedish forensic psychiatric care states that the risk of further violence must be assessed before a patient is granted release from a forensic psychiatric hospital. The aim of the study was to describe the experiences of forensic nurses with in-patient risk assessment processes, and their implication for daily clinical forensic praxis.METHOD- Semi-structured interviews with staff who were involved in the patients risk assessment process. The interview texts were analyzed using qualitative latent content analysis.DISCUSSION- The forensic nursing staff has to deal with many contradictory realities. The description was about being able to balance between supporting their work with an EBP approach of risk assessment while trying to establish interpersonal relationships and to allow for positive meetings with the patient. The study indicated that staff used a multiple sources of knowledge in order to make credible and accurate risk assessments.CONCLUSIONS- If the risk assessment process are to be used in a legally secure manner, the staff must receive regular support from team leadership that can provide both guidance and training. Based on a holistic approach, the link between the instinct of staff and their work with structured risk assessment must be founded on routines and solid platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Helén Olsson & Lisbeth Kristiansen, 2017. "Violence Risk Assessment in Forensic Nurses’ Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Interview Study," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(12), pages 1-56, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:12:p:56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/70445/38876
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/70445
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Salzmann‐Erikson & Cecilia Rydlo & Lena Wiklund Gustin, 2016. "Getting to know the person behind the illness – the significance of interacting with patients hospitalised in forensic psychiatric settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1426-1434, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Remar A. Mangaoil & Kristin Cleverley & Elizabeth Peter, 2020. "Immediate Staff Debriefing Following Seclusion or Restraint Use in Inpatient Mental Health Settings: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(7), pages 479-495, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:12:p:56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.