IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v8y2016i10p118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Is the Best Parametric Survival Models for Analyzing Hemodialysis Data?

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsen Vahedi
  • Mahmood Mahmoodi
  • Kazem Mohammad
  • Sharzad Ossareh
  • Hojjat Zeraati

Abstract

BACKGROUND- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are both common public health problems worldwide. Hemodialysis (HD) is one of the main ultimate modalities of renal replacement therapy in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the different parametric (Weibull, Gamma, Gompertz, Log-logistic and Lognormal) survival models, in maintenance HD (MHD) patients.METHOD- This study was conducted from March 2004 to October 2013 and encompassed 544 ESRD patients under MHD in Hasheminejad Kidney Center, Tehran, Iran. Laboratory, clinical and demographic data were extracted from the Hemodialysis Data Processor Software, which had been designed for data collection in Hasheminejad Kidney Center. Exponential, Weibull, Gompertz, lognormal and log-logistic were used for analyzing survival of hemodialysis patient using STATA software. To compare these models Akaike Information criterion (AIC) and Cox-Snell residual were utilized.RESULTS- According to the both criteria (AIC and Cox-Snell residual), Weibull survival model manifested better results as compared with other models. According to this model, age at the time of admission (HR=1.015, p-value=0.018), walking ability (HR=0.656, p-value=0.010), diabetes mellitus as the underlying disease (HR=1.392, p-value=0.038), hemoglobin level (HR=0.790, p-value<0.001), serum creatinine (HR=0.803, p-value<0.001), serum protein (HR=0.747, p-value=0.010) and Single pool Kt/V(HR=0.092, p-value<0.001), had significant effect on survival of the hemodialysis patient.CONCLUSION- In our analysis Weibull distribution, which had the lowest AIC value, was selected as the most suitable model.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsen Vahedi & Mahmood Mahmoodi & Kazem Mohammad & Sharzad Ossareh & Hojjat Zeraati, 2016. "What Is the Best Parametric Survival Models for Analyzing Hemodialysis Data?," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(10), pages 118-118, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/56161/30773
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/56161
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Salehi Veisi & Sadegh Rezaei & Saralees Nadarajah, 2018. "Comparing hazard models for the growth failure of children in Iran," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 999-1013, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.