IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v14y2022i11p13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of Lost to Follow Up (LTFU) among HIV Positive Patients Enrolled in 70 PEPFAR Supported Treatment Facilities in Edo, Bayelsa and Lagos States, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Eale E. Kris
  • Nwafor S. Uchenna
  • Carole Metekoua
  • Mary P. Selvaggio
  • Ladi-Akinyemi Babatunde O

Abstract

This retrospective cross-sectional study examined demographic factors that predict Lost to Follow-up (LTFU) among HIV-positive patients on treatment based on patient-level data from 2000 to 2021 from 70 the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-supported facilities in Edo, Lagos and Bayelsa states of Nigeria. A total of 32,910 patients were identified for the descriptive analysis, although only 26,797 were included in the final model due to missing values for certain variables. Descriptive statistics describe the basic features of the data, while logistic regression identified patient characteristics at ART initiation that predicted LTFU. A stepwise forward and backward regression were used to select the variables to include in the model. Despite improving adherence in each cohort initiated since 2005, a large proportion of patients (72%) were LTFU between 2005 and 2015. However, thereafter (2016 to 2020) Anti-Retroviral Therapy (ART)’s adherence improved with the average retrospective cumulative LFTU dropping to 27% for the period. The predictive analysis suggests the following patient variables are significantly associated with LTFU at 95% CI- Patients initiated prior to 2018 were 57% more likely to become LTFU. HIV patients who reported post-secondary education as their highest education level were twice as likely to become LTFU in comparison to those with no education. Compared to their counterparts aged 25+, the patients’ ages 0-19 and 20-24 subset are less likely to become LTFU. HIV patients who were divorced or separated were about 1.3 times more likely to be LTFU compared to their married counterparts. The tendency to be LTFU increases at WHO stage 2 and decreases as the patient’s WHO clinical stage progresses from stage 3 to stage 4. Lastly, patients in Edo were 23 times more likely to become LTFU, while patients in Lagos were 4 times more likely to become LTFU compared to their Bayelsa counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Eale E. Kris & Nwafor S. Uchenna & Carole Metekoua & Mary P. Selvaggio & Ladi-Akinyemi Babatunde O, 2022. "Predictors of Lost to Follow Up (LTFU) among HIV Positive Patients Enrolled in 70 PEPFAR Supported Treatment Facilities in Edo, Bayelsa and Lagos States, Nigeria," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/47894/51430
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/47894
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon G Agolory & Andrew F Auld & Solomon Odafe & Ray W Shiraishi & E Kainne Dokubo & Mahesh Swaminathan & Ibrahim Dalhatu & Dennis Onotu & Oseni Abiri & Henry Debem & Adebobola Bashorun & Tedd V Elle, 2017. "High rates of loss to follow-up during the first year of pre-antiretroviral therapy for HIV patients at sites providing pre-ART care in Nigeria, 2004–2012," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.