IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v12y2020i1p158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application-Based Medical Eligibility Criteria Model of Contraception Use

Author

Listed:
  • Haspita Rizki Syurya Handini
  • Lita Angelina Saputri
  • Yuliva Yuliva

Abstract

Masalah kesehatan reproduksi termasuk keluarga berencana merupakan salah satu permas alahan yang belum terselesaikan pada MDG's .Reproduction health problem including family planning is one of the unresolved issues in MDG's.Menurut SDKI 2012 penggunaan According to the Indonesia Health and Demography Survey in 2012, the usekontrasepsi of modern contraceptioncara modern hanya was only57,9% dan unmet need 8,5%. 57.9% and unmet need reached 8.5%.Salah satu penyebab tingginya unmet One of the causes of high unmetneed dan drop need and dropout adalah keterbatasan layanan kontrasepsi. out was the limitation of contraceptive services.Pemanfaatan Alat Bantu Pengambila n Keputusan (ABPK) berupa lembar balik dalam pelayanan kontrasepsi The use of decision making aids (ABPK) with flip chart form in contraceptive service wasdipandang kurang praktis. seen as less practical.Kemajuan teknologi memungkinkan penggunaan aplikasi dalam berbagai keperluan termasuk pelayanan kesehatan. The advance of technology allows the use of applications in various purposes including health services.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui m odel k riteria k elayakan m edis p enggunaan k ontrasepsi b erbasis a plikasi. The purpose of this study was to determine the Application-based Medical Eligibility Criteria Model of Contraceptive Use.Jenis penelitian ini adalah research and development . This study was research and development (RnD). Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah bidan yang melakukan praktik mandiri di Kota Padang yang diambil secara purposive sampling .The population in this study were midwives in independent practice in Padang, with purposive sampling technique. Data dianalisis secara kualitatif dan kuantitatifData were analyzed qualitatively and quantitativelyuntuk to determine the respondent’stingkat level ofkepuasan satisfactionresponden teabout theaplikasi . application based model.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebagian responden meng harapkan ABPK lebih The results showed that most respondents expected the decision making aids to be simple, systematic, not in “back and forth” form and pictures included. Hasil uji preliminary field testing menunjukkan bahwa 56,2% responden memiliki tingkat kepuasan yang tinggi terhadap aplikasi.The results of the preliminary field testing showed that 56.2% of respondents performed high level of satisfaction about the application-based model.Pada main product revision , dilakukan perbaikan dengan penambahan informasi dan gambar tentang metode kontrasepsi. In main product revision, improvements were made by adding information and images about contraceptive methods. PenelitianThis researchini invent the design of application based medical eligibility model of contraceptive use titled “Application of Clinical Decision Making System of Contraceptive Use”.

Suggested Citation

  • Haspita Rizki Syurya Handini & Lita Angelina Saputri & Yuliva Yuliva, 2020. "Application-Based Medical Eligibility Criteria Model of Contraception Use," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 158-158, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/41703/43289
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/41703
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.