IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v11y2019i13p91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Use of Pictograms for the Improvement in Patient Understanding of Medication Instruction–A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Hanslo
  • Velisha Ann Perumal-Pillay
  • Fatima Suleman

Abstract

The first step in ensuring patient compliance is to ensure that the patient understands how to use their medication. The aim of the study was to determine if patients understanding of medication use can be improved by using pictograms. A simple randomized control test was set up whereby 50 patients were selected to participate, of which 25 people were included in the test group to receive medication labels based on pictograms as well as the usual counselling and 25 people were included in the control group and received the usual labelling of their medication and counselling. Questionnaires were used to determine the patient’s demographic information and health literacy on the day of inclusion into the study, while another questionnaire was completed 3 to 7 days later to determine patient understanding of how to use their medication and if they used their medication correctly. At a 95% confidence interval and p<0.05 there is a relationship between improved understanding and the use of pictograms. Pictograms improve patient’s understanding of how to use their medication, which in turn lead to an improvement in adherence.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Hanslo & Velisha Ann Perumal-Pillay & Fatima Suleman, 2019. "Evaluating the Use of Pictograms for the Improvement in Patient Understanding of Medication Instruction–A Pilot Study," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(13), pages 1-91, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/41298/42711
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/41298
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.