IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v10y2018i6p136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Biological and Non Biological Agents (Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) on Bone Mineral Density in a Sample of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Hadi Al-Osami
  • Omar Farooq Al-Azzawi
  • Faiq Gorial
  • Israa Mohammed Redia

Abstract

BACKGROUND- Osteoporosis is an extra-articular complication of rheuma­toid arthritis that results in increased risk of fractures and associated mor­bidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.OBJECTIVE- To evaluate changes in bone mineral density in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on biological (anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha) and non-biological agent disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).PATIENTS & METHODS- A cross sectional study enrolled 60 RA patients diagnosed by rheumatologist according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (2010 ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for RA. Thirty patient on biological agent (anti TNF alpha) and 30 patient on non-biological agent (DMARD). RA disease-related data wincluded disease duration, disease activity score index of 28 joints (DAS 28) and clinical disease activity index (CDAI), functional class, body mass index and treatment history. vitamin D level were measured in both groups. Bone mineral density was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of hip and lumber spines for patients. A T –score of equal or less than -2.5 standard deviation that of young healthy adults were taken as osteoporotic and scores between -1 to -2.5 standard deviation was taken as osteopenic.RESULTS- Prevalence of RA patients on biological agent (anti TNF alpha) who had osteoporosis was 1(3%) and 12(40%) were osteopenic, and in patients on non biological (DMARD), Osteoporosis was present in 8(26%) and osteopenia in 13(43%, p= 0.019).Vitamin D level in patient on biological agent (anti TNF alpha) was low in 24(80%) and normal in 6 (20%) patients. While in non biological agent (DMARD) it was low in 13(43.3%) and normal in 17(56.7%) of patients, p=0.003). Patients on biological agent (anti TNF alpha); 15 (50%) patients showed high calcium, 2(6.7%) low phosphorous, and 2(6.7%) high Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) while in patients on non biological agent the results were 10 patients( 33.3%) had high calcium, and 5(16.7%) had high ALP. There was a significant decrease in bone mineral density in RA patients on DMARDS while biological agent (anti TNF alpha) had a role in arrest bone loss in RA patients.CONCLUSIONS- There was a strong association between types of therapy and reduction of bone mineral density.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Hadi Al-Osami & Omar Farooq Al-Azzawi & Faiq Gorial & Israa Mohammed Redia, 2018. "Effects of Biological and Non Biological Agents (Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) on Bone Mineral Density in a Sample of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 136-136, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/74689/41563
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/74689
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.