IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v10y2018i11p113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Quality of the Saudi Healthcare Referral System: Potential Improvements Implemented by Other Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Hilal Salim Al Shamsi
  • Abdullah Ghthaith Almutairi
  • Sulaiman Salim Al Mashrafi

Abstract

INTRODUCTION- The referral system authorizes and transfers the responsibility for healthcare services from one provider to another. A key component of the system is the communication between primary-care and specialist providers. Poor communication between them is detrimental to and can cause significant issues with coordination of effective care. OBJECTIVE- The purpose of this review was to evaluate current healthcare referral systems, focusing on the communication among providers, and to suggest practices that could make the Saudi healthcare referral system more effective. DESIGN- This systematic review identified published studies of the quality of the healthcare referral system in Saudi Arabia and other countries using two databases, Medline and PubMed. Data were summarized and extracted into two tables. RESULTS- The review included 12 studies that met its selection criteria. These studies were conducted in various regions of Saudi Arabia, but mostly the west and north. The 12 studies included 181,192 participants, with numbers of participants ranging from 21 to 138,484. The present review found that more than 50% of the referral documents and feedback reports in these studies had incomplete patient information. Implementation of electronic referrals (e-referrals) in several countries, including Australia, New Zealand and the United States, improved their referral systems, particularly by solving the problem of incomplete referral documents. In addition, the present review found that in some specialist clinics, referral cases contributed to increased workloads. One study reported on implementation of Lean Six Sigma principles in a military hospital in western Saudi Arabia, which reduced the number of referrals delayed, inappropriate referrals and the response time to referrals (7%). E-referrals and Lean Six Sigma principles may be applicable in Saudi Arabia as solutions to referral and response-time problems. CONCLUSIONS- An increase in healthcare referrals in Saudi Arabia has caused an increase in missing essential information in referral letters and feedback reports as well as overcrowding in specialist clinics. The results of the present review suggested that implementing e-referral and Lean Six Sigma principles may improve the quality of Saudi Arabia’s healthcare referral system.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilal Salim Al Shamsi & Abdullah Ghthaith Almutairi & Sulaiman Salim Al Mashrafi, 2018. "Assessing the Quality of the Saudi Healthcare Referral System: Potential Improvements Implemented by Other Systems," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(11), pages 113-113, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/37161/37363
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/37161
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Layla Khogeer & Narmin Helal & Osama Basri & Sara Madani & Abeer Basri & Azza A. El-Houseiny, 2021. "Instrument Development and Validation to Assess Care Barriers for Patients in Saudi Arabia with Oral Clefts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-8, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.