IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/cisjnl/v16y2023i3p30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drawbacks of Traditional Environmental Monitoring Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sadiku Aminu Sani
  • Amina Ibrahim
  • Abuhuraira Ado Musa
  • Muntaka Dahiru
  • Muhammad Ahmad Baballe

Abstract

Traditional methods for evaluating water quality have a number of drawbacks. They need expensive, specialized equipment as well as knowledgeable employees first. Second, data loss may result from human error. Thirdly, because people rather than algorithms will be analyzing the obtained data, these schemes cannot foresee future patterns. Additionally, changes in the characteristics of water may result from the sample transit process. Therefore, it is challenging to consistently check water quality using outdated monitoring techniques. The disadvantages of traditional environmental monitoring techniques have been covered in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadiku Aminu Sani & Amina Ibrahim & Abuhuraira Ado Musa & Muntaka Dahiru & Muhammad Ahmad Baballe, 2023. "Drawbacks of Traditional Environmental Monitoring Systems," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:cisjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/cis/article/download/0/0/49187/53048
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/cis/article/view/0/49187
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:cisjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.