IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v22y2026i1p41.html

Gender Order and Negotiation in the Huashan Festival: A Study of Cultural Continuity from a Cross-Domain Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Huang Yiping
  • Ku Boon Dar
  • Sah-Hadiyatan Ismail

Abstract

The Huashan Festival and Miao New Year celebrations operate as more than vehicles for ethnic identity or ritual transmission. They also function as contested public arenas of social interaction in which gender norms are continually interpreted, negotiated, and reconfigured through performative and organisational practices. In this context, “cultural continuity” does not refer to the static preservation of tradition. Instead, it describes the active and often complex ways that communities sustain the legitimacy of core values within shifting spatial and temporal contexts marked by migration, media circulation, and institutional change. This involves processes of memory selection, ritual reorganisation, and institutional adaptation that are inseparable from underlying struggles over power and symbolic authority. Drawing on frameworks of ritual social reproduction and gendered agency, this research synthesises ethnographic data, archival material, and oral histories from Hmong/Miao communities in Southwest China, the highlands of, Northern Thailand, and the United States across multiple generational cohorts. The study examines how transnational mobility and mediatization reshape narrative authority within and beyond festival spaces. By analysing the distribution of discursive power, the valuation of aesthetic labour, and the governance of festival organisations as historically contingent processes, the research challenges the assumption that structural continuity inevitably overrides transformative agency. Instead, it shows that, despite an overarching patriarchal context, the combined forces of mass education, migration, and digital media have enabled women to move from roles as passive “visible performers” to positions as active “governance participants” with genuine interpretive authority in decision-making, representation, and norm-setting. This transformation, however, follows different trajectories across diaspora, urban, and rural settings due to uneven access to resources and institutional platforms. As a result, the belief that inclusivity necessarily weakens tradition appears conceptually flawed within prevailing cultural preservation discourses. The findings demonstrate that, under appropriate institutional and economic conditions, widening participation and empowering narrative actors can strengthen cultural resilience and intergenerational cohesion rather than dilute ritual meaning. To ground this claim in practice, this study proposes specific governance indicators, including the gender composition of speakers and judging panels, as well as the application of community codes of conduct formulated through participatory consultation. These indicators are not offered as definitive conclusions, but as verifiable and transparent tools for evaluating the evolving dynamics of cultural practice over time and across contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang Yiping & Ku Boon Dar & Sah-Hadiyatan Ismail, 2026. "Gender Order and Negotiation in the Huashan Festival: A Study of Cultural Continuity from a Cross-Domain Comparative Perspective," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 22(1), pages 1-41, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:22:y:2026:i:1:p:41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/52834/57598
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/52834
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:22:y:2026:i:1:p:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.